I deliberately did not watch the first debate because like all other political things that include dhimocrapts, I suspected the debates would be rigged and frankly, I wasn't interested. I figured that all the trusted American news sources would tell me what to think the next morning. I went on the net and looked for debate results in no particular order and lo and behold, I calculated that Trump won by 67.4% to 32.5% for Clinton. This was non-rigorously extracted from the net reporting by site. If you notice, I found only one conservative site, but selection was by accident until I got bored.
Clinton Trump
Slate 44.82% 55.18% Historically Librul
Drudge 17.66% 82.34% Historically Conservative
CBS 39.5% 60.5% Historically Leans Librul
ABC 15% 84.9% Historically Leans Librul
TIME 45% 55% Crazy, wild out of their minds Librul
Breitbart Couldn't find their results - Reported Hillary won
CNBC 33% 67% No opinion on these guys
_______ _______ ______
Average 32.5% 67.4% Not Weighted
I have posted this, because after the journolists have had time to sober up and have received their marching orders from their bosses, they ALL report that Hillary won the debate, even those from the above organizations. I think I see history being made here, the librul way. I just wanted to get this written down, so that when the history is officially rewritten, I will have some idea what actually happened.
The Intellectual Yet Idiot
"By Nassim Nicholas Taleb via HotAir
What we have been seeing worldwide, from India to the UK to the US, is the rebellion against the inner circle of no-skin-in-the-game policymaking “clerks” and journalists-insiders, that class of paternalistic semi-intellectual experts with some Ivy league, Oxford-Cambridge, or similar label-driven education who are telling the rest of us 1) what to do, 2) what to eat, 3) how to speak, 4) how to think… and 5) who to vote for."
I quoted Mr. Taleb's post verbatum to give an example of outstanding thinking available from the net. Please look him up. He is a genius. Not one of our news readers or commenters understand what is driving this quiet political revolution around the world.. Even with all their "education" and "credentials" they don't, and to use the concept of "irredeemable", ever will understand what is going on. Please go to Hot Air to read his thoughts or look him up on the net!
I won't post at Hot Air anymore because they are now using faceboot for comments. I don't particularly have a problem with Hot Air, but their policy is turning them into a librul soapbox. However, that doesn't mean I wont peruse their content without commenting.
"By Nassim Nicholas Taleb via HotAir
What we have been seeing worldwide, from India to the UK to the US, is the rebellion against the inner circle of no-skin-in-the-game policymaking “clerks” and journalists-insiders, that class of paternalistic semi-intellectual experts with some Ivy league, Oxford-Cambridge, or similar label-driven education who are telling the rest of us 1) what to do, 2) what to eat, 3) how to speak, 4) how to think… and 5) who to vote for."
I quoted Mr. Taleb's post verbatum to give an example of outstanding thinking available from the net. Please look him up. He is a genius. Not one of our news readers or commenters understand what is driving this quiet political revolution around the world.. Even with all their "education" and "credentials" they don't, and to use the concept of "irredeemable", ever will understand what is going on. Please go to Hot Air to read his thoughts or look him up on the net!
I won't post at Hot Air anymore because they are now using faceboot for comments. I don't particularly have a problem with Hot Air, but their policy is turning them into a librul soapbox. However, that doesn't mean I wont peruse their content without commenting.